Thursday, December 10, 2009
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Monday, November 16, 2009
Hezekiah Harris provide false documents to play football. He claimed to be Tyrone Davis. The long and short of it is that even though Hezekiah would have been eligible to play he has been disqualified. Not only has he been disqualified his whole team has been disqualified.
Why is it more important to present valid documentation to play youth football than to be president?
Hezekiah was eligible but he used false documents. Maybe Obama is eligible but he has not provided the correct documents. He is still legally Barry Sotero as far as any legal documents have yet to claim. He should be disqualified if he cannot provide the proper documents. If the same justice was served as it was in the youth football case not only would Obama be disqualified but his whole team would be too. I do not know if that team would just be his cabinet or the entire Democrat Party, maybe the Republican Party also since the often seem to be all on the same team.
It is sad that who is eligible to play youth football is more important than who is eligible to be president.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Friday, August 28, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Thursday, April 2, 2009
|Posted by Andrew Sica on 03/12/09 10:37 PM|
Last updated 03/16/09 10:02 AM
[Newer: Sen. Grassley has a plan for AIG execs - but it makes perfect sense for all politicians to follow!] [Older: Raw story reports that Cheney had an assassination squad reporting to him during the Bush years!]
Dear Connecticut Campaign for Liberty Members,
State sovereignty is one of the most important issues in front of us today - it is nearly impossible to get anything done at the federal level, but our state legislators still listen. We want to empower them to make the right decision, by ensuring they understand the proper, Constitutional role of the federal government.
Please join your fellow CT C4L members on Saturday April 11th, at 2pm, as we show a video presentation by Dr. Edwin Vieira titled "The Purse and the Sword". Dr. Vieira has a well thought out plan to inject sound money and constitutional "homeland security" at the state level - it is 10th amendment legislation, but with teeth! Joining us will be Committees of Safety founder, Walter Reddy. (P.S. Walter is a Campaign for Liberty precinct leader here in Connecticut!).
I believe this will be a major focus for our group in Connecticut - this event is intended to introduce everyone to the plan and discuss what we can do to get this legislation passed! I hope that we will be able to work with the Committees of Safety to ensure that Connecticut is the first state to pass REAL legislation that will peacefully establish state sovereignty here - putting chains on the feds!
The meeting will be at Russell Library in Middletown, CT:
123 Broad Street
NOTE: The purpose of this event is not to get you to "join the Committees of Safety" or anything of the sort - it is to start to take back our state rights from the feds by working in a coalition with another organization that is dedicated to the same principles that we are!
There is a flyer available for download: http://www.libertyinconnecticut.com/pubuploads/C4LCOS411flyer.pdf
Please, invite your friends!
R.S.V.P to Andrew.Sica@CampaignForLiberty.com
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Monday, March 23, 2009
Here is one suggestion that I heard and thought was pretty good. Congress wants all bonuses paid by companies that received stimulus money to be returned to the treasury. How about all campaign contribution paid by companies receiving stimulus money be returned to the treasury.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Monday, February 23, 2009
Friday, February 20, 2009
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Sunday, February 15, 2009
The following is an email from the Green Party of Connecticut dealing with a ballot access bill that they were instrumental in getting introduced. If you can attend the hearing please do.
Today the GAE (Government And Elections) committee released HR 6436 in written form. I gave the bill to Atty. and CT Green Party co-chair Steve Fornier to look at earlier today. He says that the bill would reduce our state-wide office and congressional petitioning requirements to 1000 valid signatures (VS 7500 SIGNATURES OR 1% OF THE VOTES IN LAST ELECTION UNDER THE PRESENT LAW).
In the past we have been required to collect 7500 valid signatures to get on the ballot for president or for other state-wide office and we have had to collect over 3000 valid signatures for congress. The bill also requires the Sec. of the State to do all the checking of the signatures and takes the responsibility away from the town clerks.
The following link will direct you to a PDF of HB 6436: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/TOB/h/pdf/2009HB-06436-R00-HB.pdf.
Read it and let me know what you think!
There is going to be a public hearing on this bill VERY SOON. Here is the info from the GAE website:
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Download to Calendar
Government Administration and Elections Committee Meeting followed by a Public Hearing
LOB Room 2B
YOU NEED TO GET THERE AT 8AM TO SIGN UP TO SPEAK. THE PUBLIC HEARING SPEAKERS LIST IS AVAILABLE AT 8:30AM. IF YOU GET THERE EARLY
YOU CAN GET OUT VERY EARLY AND MOST OF THE REPRESENTATIVES WILL BE THERE TO HEAR YOUR TESTIMONY. THE WHOLE EVENT IS ON THE CT NETWORK,
ANOTHER WAY TO GET OUR MESSAGE OUT. THIS BILL CAME FROM THE CO-CHAIRS OF THE GAE COMMITTEE AFTER SEVERAL OF US MET WITH THEM
MAKE A SPECIAL EFFORT TO ATTEND THIS HEARING. IF THIS BILL PASSES IT WILL ABLE TO MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE TO THE GREEN
PARTY AND WILL REDUCE ONE OF MOST UNFAIR AND DISCRIMINATORY MINOR PARTY REQUIREMENTS FOR BALLOT ACCESS. CALL YOUR REP, AND
ASK THAT SHE OR HE SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
First in 2004 when John Kerry was running for president one of his talking points was that he would eliminate the tax breaks for companies that move out of the country. My only criticism of him at the time was that why didn't he propose it when the Democrats had control of both houses and Clinton was president. Now Obama is president and the Democrats have larger majorities in both houses. This is an idea that really would stimulate the economy.
Now in 2008 Obama campaigned on changing NAFTA. Well lets do it. This is another that would actually stimulate the economy if done right.
I am sure there are more are I really haven't thought that hard, but why haven't these ideas been brought up to stimulate the economy? Don't the Democrats really want to stimulate the economy?
Friday, February 6, 2009
Monday, February 2, 2009
This give me hope that though we are now subject to a government that in many ways is more tyrannical than that which we declared ourselves independent of in 1776. (Read the list of grievances against King George listed in the Declaration of Independence.) I believe freedom and liberty can once again be ours.
There are those who seek so called liberty and freedom so that they may use it for their own lascivious ends. I now realize that we will not see the hand of God as needed to accomplish a "second American revolution" if we align ourselves with those who will not honor God in their pursuit of liberty. They may follow but we must lead. This battle must first be waged from our churches. Those that claim the liberty which is in Christ must not fear the tyranny that our government threatens for expressing the ideals of freedom and liberty in an organized church setting. We for decades bashed the Soviet Union fro having registered churches. We have them here. We register for tax exempt status, then we allow the government to put restrictions on what we can and cannot say from the pulpit. Yes, now the restrictions are "political" confined mostly to what you can or cannot say about a candidate. But what is next?...Is it not even a stretch to believe they will soon try to tell us what we can say about so called political issues...abortion, homosexuality, etc. Then what?...Restrictions on what you can say about the Gospel. "I'm sorry you can't say that it is not inclusive enough" or "it's discriminatory."
We are outnumbered, we are out financed, we are out trained. But with the hand of God we can win this revolution. My fear is not that we can't win but that we won't fight. I do not think that with today's churches the first revolution would have been fought and that is my fear for the second revolution.